Skip to main content

Editorial Standards

Dark Skies Atlas is an independent dark-sky travel guide. This page explains how we work: where information comes from, how we check it, and what happens when something is wrong.

How we research content

We start with primary sources: official dark-sky reserve and park sites for access rules and Bortle ratings, observatory and lodge operators for booking details and availability, and recognised bodies such as the International Dark-Sky Association for certification status. Where a source has direct authority over a fact, we go to that source first.

Secondary sources — field reports, astrophotographer trip logs, and reader submissions — fill in what official channels do not cover well, such as whether a lodge's "dark-sky terrace" is actually shielded from the car park lights.

Fact-checking methodology

  • Primary-source first: For facts with operational impact (access rules, prices, availability), we go to the authoritative source before anywhere else.
  • Cross-checking: When a detail is volatile or commonly wrong across the web, we compare multiple sources before publishing.
  • Editorial review: An editor reviews changes before publication. We do not auto-refresh timestamps without reviewing the underlying content.
  • Transparent uncertainty: If something changes frequently — seasonal access roads, tour schedules — we say so and tell readers to verify before they travel.

Update policy

We update pages when information has changed or when a review finds something stale. Not on an automated schedule. High-priority pages — those covering site access, lodge availability, and tour bookings — get reviewed more often than evergreen background and science pages.

Seasonal content gets close attention before the relevant window: aurora season guides before autumn, meteor shower pages before peak dates, eclipse guides well in advance of the event.

Use of official and recognised sources

Where relevant, editorial pages link directly to official dark-sky reserve sites, the International Dark-Sky Association, national park authorities, observatory operators, and recognised astronomical bodies. These links are there so readers can verify details or keep researching.

Corrections and feedback

If something is wrong, email us. Include the page URL and the specific correction: not just "the details are wrong" but what the correct information is and where you found it. We check before we change anything, and we make the correction when the evidence supports it.

Contact: darkskiesatlas.akzfk@simplelogin.com

Want to know more about the site or the people behind it?

About Dark Skies Atlas Meet the editorial team Report an issue

Editorial FAQ

How often do you review practical information?

We review pages when we make substantive editorial changes, and we prioritise the fields most likely to go stale: lodge details, tour availability, site access rules, and Bortle ratings. Background and science pages are reviewed less urgently than booking-critical logistics.

Do you accept corrections from readers or operators?

Yes. If something is wrong or out of date, email us the page URL and the specific correction. We check reader reports against the primary source before making changes. We do not apply corrections on faith alone.

Do sponsored partners control editorial recommendations?

No. Commercial relationships do not determine which lodges, tours, or destinations we recommend. If we choose a small cabin over a well-funded competitor, it is because the sky quality and location are better, not because of an arrangement.